The Effect of Simultaneous and Sequential Performance Evaluations on Restricting the Formal Diversity of Design

  • Dhuha Abed al-gany Al-Kazzaz
  • Ayad Waleed Aswad
Keywords: Performance-based Design, Simulation, Evaluation, Simultaneous evaluatio, Sequential Evaluation

Abstract

Performance-based architectural design is an approach to consider building performance as a key element in its generation and formation. This trend has become possible due to the development of digital technologies which enabled the designer to simulate the building performance digitally in different areas of
design such as constructional, environmental, etc. In this approach, the performance assessment is an essential facility in the derivation of architectural form. Previous studies showed different opinions about where, when and how to apply evaluation criteria. Consequently, the research problem has been identified
as: there is no clear understanding of the effect of different methods of assessing performance criteria (simultaneous and sequential) on the formal diversity of design alternatives. Accordingly, the paper adopts a computerized design strategy based on specific performance criteria and using commercial CAD software to explore the impact of changing the sequence of performance criteria on the formal diversity of design alternatives. The results show that the best designs resulting from the simultaneous evaluation differ from those resulting from the sequential evaluation. In addition, designs resulting from the sequential evaluation process vary when the sequence of performance criteria adopted in the evaluation is changed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abel, C., 2004, Architecture, Technology and Process, Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

Capeluto, G., and Yezioro, A., 2012. Foster + Partners, Perform: Performance as Producer of Architectural Form, In Performalism: Form and Performance in Digital Architecture, Grobman, Yasha J. and Neuman,Eran (eds), London: Routledge.

Fasoulaki, E.,2008. Integrated Design, A Generative Multi-Performative Design Approach, MSc. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.

Grobman, Y. J., Ron Ruth, 2011. Digital Form Finding, Generative use of simulation processes by architects in the early stages of the design process”. Proceeding of the 29th eCAADe: City Modeling, pp. 107-115.

Grobman, Y.J., Yezioro A. and Capeluto I.G., 2007. Performance Based Form-generation in Architectural Design – Using Performance Envelopes in a GenerativeComputer-Oriented Design Method”. Proc. of Tectonics Making Meaning International Conference, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands.

Kolarevic, Branko, 2004. Back to the Future: Performative Architecture International,Journal of

Architectural Computing, vol. 2 - no.1.

Kolarevic, Branko, 2003. Computing the Performative in Architecture” Digital Design, 21th. eCAADe

Conference Proceedings, Graz, Austria.

Oxman, Rivka, 2008. Performance-based Design: Current Practices and Research Issues , International journal of architectural computing, issue 01,volume 06.

Oxman, Rivka, 2009.Performative design: a performance-based model of digital architectural design,Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, volume 36, pages 1026 –1037,

Preiser ,W. F.E. and Vischer, J. C., 2005. Assessing Building Performance, Butterworth Heinmann: Elsevier.

SHI,Xing, 2010. Performance-basedand performance-driven architecturalDesign and Optimization.Front. Archit. Civ. Eng. China 2010, 4(4): 512–518.

Turrin, M., Buelow, P. V., &Stouffs, R.,2011. Design explorations of performance driven geometry in architectural design using parametric modeling and genetic algorithms,Advanced Engineering

Informatics, 25, 656–675.

Published
2018-12-15
How to Cite
Al-Kazzaz, D. A. al- gany and Aswad, A. W. (2018) “The Effect of Simultaneous and Sequential Performance Evaluations on Restricting the Formal Diversity of Design”, Iraqi Journal of Architecture and Planning, 17(2). doi: 10.36041/iqjap.v17i2.432.
Section
General Architecture: Theory, Design, Methods