Effectiveness of Sustainable Urban Projects in the city of Baghdad

A comparative study of sustainable development projects in Adhamiya and KadhimiyaDistrict

  • Wadhah Abdul sahib Hussein
  • Zaynab Radi Abaas
Keywords: Effectiveness of Sustainable Urban Projects

Abstract

This research comes in an attempt to evaluate and compare between the efficiency of a selected sustainable urban projects from Baghdad city (Al Adhamiya and Al Kadhimiya areas) through applying the criteria ofurban sustainability and compared using SWOT analyses model(represents one strong word: S = strengths, W = weaknesses, O = opportunities, T = threats.), this done by examine the most important strategies which targeted to extrapolate the urban form as a vital sustainable structure, and has become a standard which could measure and evaluate the impact of the application for sustainable criteria. These strategies know as Smart Growth Strategies which include, Development, Design, Transportation, Open & Natural Space Protection, Open Space Creation, Sense of Place, and Urban Community Strategies. Here this search tries to extract the most local standards that consistent with the nature and environment of sustainable urban Iraqi projects in general and Baghdad in particular by reviewing the Smart Growth principles and strategies. However, the aim is to determine the effectiveness and the successfulness of the adopted urban projects in Baghdad in applying the urban sustainability criteria in the one hand, and to extract the most important positive points which serve the local environment and utilize them to establish the foundations for possible urban standards adopted in the evaluation of sustainable urban future projects on the others.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

] Arigoni, Danielle, 2001, Affordable Housing and Smart Growth Making the Connection. National Neighborhood Coalition Publisher pp.14,20.

] Caceres, J. L. Urban Land Institute-Sacramento District Council, 2004, Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG). Pp.1-3

] CERVERO & others, 2004, Transit-Oriented Development in the United States: Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects, ,Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. pp. 2-5

] Dougherty,Forinash, Millard-Ball and Tumlin, No date, Transportation options: Smart Growth Alternatives to Minimum Parking Requirements,. Pp. 1-12

] Iams, Alex, and Kaplan, Pearl, August 2006, Economic Development andSmart Growth : 8 Case Studies on the Connections Between Smart Growth Development and Jobs, Wealth, and Quality of Life in Communities, International Economic Development Council, Washington, D C. pp.5, 8.

] ICMA, 2002, the International City/County Management Association "Getting to Smart Growth: 100 POLICIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION",Published by Smart Growth network. Pp.2, 33-46,77-89

] Keiner, 2006, "MACRO SUSTAINABILITY ORIENTED URBAN DEVELOPMENT:A General Introduction with Case Studies from Gaborone", Johannesburg and Santiago de Chile (Institute for Spatial and Landscape Planning, ETH Zurich). P.8,18

] Kelsey, C. W. (2004). SMART GROWTH PLANNING PRINCIPLES AND PARKS AND RECREATION . Retrieved 2012, from SMART GROWTH PLANNING PRINCIPLES. p.p 1-4 : http://www.playsafe.com/Documents/Magazines/SmartGrowthPlanningPrinciples.pdf

] Li- Yin Shen, J. Jorge Ochoa, Mona N., Shah B, Xiaoling Zhang. (2011, (35)). The application of urban sustainability indicators e A comparison between various practices. Habitat International, PP. 17-29.

] MARC, 2008,"Manual of Best Management Practices forStormwater Quality", Regional Water Quality Education Program.p.1

] Murtada, Hassaneen, 2012, Expansion in HadraKadhimiya on the Urban Structure of the Surrounding Area University of Baghdad , Higher Institute For Urban And Regional Planning, high diploma. pp 43-46, 64-70.

] Nelson, A. C. FAICP" Smart Growth Policies: An Evaluation of Programs and Outcomes ", 2010, Journal of the American Planning Association, Metropolitan Research Center, University of Utah.p1-2.

] Sassi, P. Strategies for Sustainable Architecture". (2006).Taylor & Francis Group Inc. USA and Canada.pp.17, 4

Websites:

] Al-Jamil., A.-S. (2006, 5 2). homeland forEveryone . Retrieved 2012, from Arabic website:http://www.sayyaraljamil.com/Arabic/viewarticle.php?id=chosen_readings-20060605-995

] Jassim, K. (2012, 2 25). Culture Adhamiya. Retrieved 2012, from http://www.daraddustour.com.

] smartgrowth gateway. (2010). Retrieved 2012, from http://smartgrowth.bc.ca/aboutus/ smartgrowth principles/tabid/133/def ault.aspx.

] Strategies for protecting natural and cultural features. (2010). Retrieved 2012, from http://smartgrowth.bc.ca/AboutUs/Issues/NaturalandCulturalHeritage/tabid/104/Default.aspx.

] SWOT Analysis Matrix. (2012). Retrieved 2012, from Maxi-Pedia: http://www.maxi-pedia.com/SWOT+analysis+matrix+method+mode

] 10 Smart Growth Principles. (2012). Retrieved 2012, from Smart Growth BC: http://www.smartgrowth.bc.ca/Default.aspx?tabid=133

Table (1)

Kadhimiya SWOTanalyses

Resource: the researchers

Environmental results Negative factors Positive factors

Weaknesses Strengths

Internal Environment

1 The project has adopted the economic factorand neglectedthe socialfactor.

Lack of development of the riverbank 1. Mixed land uses were preparedin the project's plans.

The plan soughtfor the development ofresidentialareasand services.

Attention was takentopedestrian movementareas.

Achieve completions of the urban fabric of the project.

Threats Opportunities

External Environment

3 Thestudyarea wasn't linkedwithneighborhoods

Lack of access to the Tigris River.

Thedesignmaintainedonly4.4% ofthehousing oldfabric.

There is nomechanismto connectwithcity servicesnetwork.

lack of implementation with the cost allocations of investment

Thestudyareawas linked withthepublictransportationnetworkof the city.

5

Factors

results

Published
2018-11-21
How to Cite
Hussein, W. A. sahib and Abaas, Z. R. (2018) “Effectiveness of Sustainable Urban Projects in the city of Baghdad”, Iraqi Journal of Architecture and Planning, 12(1). doi: 10.36041/iqjap.v12i1.173.
Section
Urban Design